Im Just Saying: The Podcast Episode 22

March 29th, 2010 Michael No comments

Im Just Saying: The Podcast
Episode 22

Download the show here.
How did our little show get sponsors? I have no idea, but big thanks to Sweet Mesquite Baker and G.E.T. Enterprises for sponsoring the show this week.

This week we freeflow on a few things I’ve been wanting to talk about, and enjoy ourselves an adult beverage.

Follow us on Twitter – @JustSayingPod
Friend us on Facebook – I’m Just Saying: The Podcast
Subscribe on iTunes – I’m Just Saying: The Podcast
Questions? Comments? Complaints? Be a part of The Truth: Email me at Michael@imjustsayingpodcast.com

FacebookMySpaceTwitterDeliciousRedditDiggStumbleUponYahoo BuzzShare
Categories: Podcast Tags:

Fair market?

March 24th, 2010 Michael No comments

Lemme ask the ladies a question. If a man took you out to a nice dinner, a show, drinks, dancing, the whole works where you have the time of your life, but then suggested you pick up the tab or suggested you go dutch, what’s the likelyhood (on a scale of 1 to 100) that you’d sleep with him? Shut up, because the answer is about no chance in hell. Will you sleep with a man that buys you things? Maybe, maybe not. But you sure as hell won’t sleep with a man that won’t. Why? Because sex has value. Women have it, men want it, and we’re willing to trade time and expense to get it. Some women “charge” more, some less. And this doesn’t even take in to account the hundreds of women selling out for reality tv fame.

But at the end of the day, it’s just the socially kosher way of prostitution. Sure, you’re not standing on the corner giving a half and half for $70 (on special this week), but given the price of booze in a bar, it’s about as expensive and takes longer to pick a girl up the “legit” way. Although some would condemn this part of society, the fact of the matter is that bar hopping and hooking up is more or less mainstream. So why can’t I just call in a pro?

And since we don’t want to touch the fair market and since we don’t want to be socialist/communists, explain to me why a woman is on trial for being willing to trade (on the open market) sex for World Series tickets.

Walter Perez

DOYLESTOWN, Pa. – March 24, 2010 — A jury of seven women and five men has been chosen in suburban Philadelphia to hear the case of a woman accused of offering an undercover police officer sexual favors in return for World Series tickets.

Susan Finkelstein appeared anything but concerned as she arrived arm-in-arm with her husband at the Bucks County Courthouse where her prostitution trial got under way.

The 44-year-old Philadelphian was arrested in October after posting an ad on Craigslist describing herself as a “buxon blonde in desperate need of 2 World Series tickets. Price negotiable. I’m the creative type.”

Assistant DA Steven Jones questioned the undercover officer who was sent to meet Finkelsteikn at a bar in Bensalem.

Jones also produced three topless photos of Finkelstein she allegedly e-mailed after investigators answered her ad.

The officer added that Finkelstein claimed to have an open marriage, was OK with group sex for more tickets, and then discretely flashed him while they were sitting at the bar.

But the defense paints a very different picture.

Finkelstein’s attorney, William Brennan, told the jury of 7 women and 5 men that his client is guilty of nothing, but having bad taste; that she’s already suffered enough for her lack of inhibition.

“She lost her job as a result of this case and she wanted World Series tickets for herself and her husband and went to novel steps to try to obtain them,” Brennan said.

This trial is expected to wrap up Thursday.

Neither Mrs. Finkelstein or her husband would speak to Action News on camera, but they did say when the verdict is handed down, they will have a lot to say.

——-

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

FacebookMySpaceTwitterDeliciousRedditDiggStumbleUponYahoo BuzzShare
Categories: Michael Tags:

Pretty soon it adds up to real money

March 22nd, 2010 Michael No comments

By LINDA BRILL / KING 5 News
KING5
updated 10:48 p.m. PT, Mon., March. 22, 2010
SEATTLE – The Seattle School District is now charging a fee on money raised by parents for schools. The new policy is making some generous parents very angry.

The district is now charging parent groups a 3.3 percent fee for their grants to public schools. Money raised from bake sales, auctions and other fundraisers will be charged the fee if the money goes to the school in the form of a grant.

“That adds insult to injury,” says parent Jane Davies, whose parent group raised nearly $90,000 dollars for Salmon Bay School. “We are already having to raise money for what should be covered as basic education and that’s frustrating.”

Davies’ parent group grant is helping to pay for a part time librarian, music teacher and gym teacher.

The Seattle School District says the fee is needed to pay for administrative costs of the grant. They already charge a fee when they receive a federal grant. The district recently announced layoffs of 900 central staff workers in an effort to cut their budget by $25 million next year.

“Parents are the heart and soul and spirit and passion of the Seattle Public Schools. We’ve got 45,000 students and their parents are working every day to support schools by volunteering hundreds of hours and to tax them with a parent tax is just beyond silly,” said State Representative Reuven Carlyle, D-Seattle.

Are you kidding me? So that I understand correctly, Seattle schools can’t afford to spend free money? They have to charge a fee for donating? In what backwards universe does that make sense? Do you know how much time it takes to spend free money? About negative seconds. What, free money? Thank you and it’s gone. That simple. I can’t believe that there’s so much grant money flowing in to a district that is constantly opening, closing, reopening schools and trying to stay solvent, that they need a team of people to manage the fund. It should be pretty damn easy: What ever the money was raised for, that’s how it’s spent. It takes people to figure that out? Sounds to me they just want to keep people on the payroll, are a little butt hurt that parents are doing the job the administration should be doing, and they want to get a piece of the pie. This isn’t rocket science, folks. If the Seattle school district needs to take a cut of free money so they can pay people to dispense the free money, I’d say there are much bigger problems in the district than just a funding shortage.

Too bad our representatives will never put politics aside and fix anything.

FacebookMySpaceTwitterDeliciousRedditDiggStumbleUponYahoo BuzzShare
Categories: Michael Tags:

Im Just Saying: The Podcast Episode 21.5

March 21st, 2010 Michael No comments

So I had intended on doing an entire show on the need for health care reform, as was requested of me weeks ago. But unfortunately the argument I was going to make was a personal one, and due to potentially pending legal action, I’ve decided it’s best left for another day. Instead I defer to that Leftist Nazi, Jon Stewart. That’s right, a Jewish Nazi.

FacebookMySpaceTwitterDeliciousRedditDiggStumbleUponYahoo BuzzShare
Categories: Michael Tags:

How often is too much?

March 18th, 2010 Michael No comments

Ok, so I started watching this video thinking I’d get fired up because it was obviously going to put men down and say we’re all dogs and need to control ourselves and blah blah blah. But instead it was actually very humorous and rather than keep my mistake quiet, I felt compelled to share it.

FacebookMySpaceTwitterDeliciousRedditDiggStumbleUponYahoo BuzzShare
Categories: Michael Tags:

Judging a book by it’s cover

March 16th, 2010 Michael No comments

On this past Sunday, the girlfriend and I were downtown for Day Two of the Emerald City Comic Con. Finding myself cashless after Day One, we had to walk a few blocks to the credit union so we could restock our funds. On the way back, a woman in a wheelchair, who I know to be a beggar, approached us from behind:

“Excuse me,” she said. I immediately retorted:
“I don’t have anything, unfortunately.”
“Oh, no, I was just trying to get around you there,” and she gestured to the sidewalk ramp.
“Oh, I’m sorry. No problem.”
“It’s Ok, I understand.”

Then she engaged us in conversation for the next two blocks. My girlfriend called me a punk for assuming she was going to ask for money. When I told her that I had seen the woman before, she said there’s no way I could have remembered her and that I was just covering for looking like an idiot.

Seriously? At what point have I ever passed a bullshit lie off to cover for my honesty? And why would I even need to in this situation. Firstly, I made a reasonable assumption based on the information I had at the moment while passing through an area (Westlake, Pike Place, etc) fraught with beggars, homeless, and street hustlers. Secondly, I didn’t feel the least bit bad about being wrong. What was there to feel bad about? Thirdly, I contend that had I not jumped the gun, she would have in fact hit us up, and her ongoing line of questioning was in attempt to find an opening to try again. And finally, am I a punk for the situation? Is it any one part or the totality of the events? Is assuming she wanted money the crime or not feeling guilty later on? Let me know in the comments….

This presents a larger issue; profiling. Apologist Seattle gets its panties in a twist when it comes up. They say you can’t just look at someone and know what you’re dealing with, the whole ‘don’t judge a book by its cover’ bit. But isn’t our outward appearance a reflection of who we are? If you look homeless, indigent, or otherwise a mess, shouldn’t you expect to be treated as such? And if you aren’t actually homeless. why present yourself that way? It may not be fair, but if you’re a young black man wearing 3XL shirts and huge jeans that sit at your knees, a NY Yankees hat (black, with all the tags still on) turned to the side, a Northface ski jacket in the middle of summer, I’m going to assume you’re a punk wannabe gangbanger up to no good. Don’t like it? Don’t dress like punk wannabe gangbangers. Don’t want to be mistaken for a terrorist? Don’t start praying to Allah at thirty-thousand feet. And if you look homeless, in an area full of homeless people, what do you think people are going to take you for? Most people don’t overtly profile by race, but they do profile by the totality of your presentation. Humanity communicated visually for thousands of years, body language is more expressive than any language on Earth; to cry foul over what is our predominate means of communication is laughable.

Be honest here, folks; those dressing like punk wannabe gangbangers do so because they want you to fear them, to think they’re tough and not to be messed with. It makes them feel stronger and more in control than they actually are. Someone wondering aimlessly around downtown, dressed like a homeless person, is a homeless person. No one presents that image by choice. Everyone with reasonable means dresses to the image and personality they want to convey, and to not judge them accordingly would be antithetical to their very reason for dressing as they do.

Bringing this full circle, I’ll take my lumps when expressing my point of view conflicts with societal norms, but I won’t be thrown under the bus when reality conflicts with the same norms.

FacebookMySpaceTwitterDeliciousRedditDiggStumbleUponYahoo BuzzShare
Categories: Michael Tags:

Im Just Saying: The Podcast Episode 21

March 14th, 2010 Michael No comments

Im Just Saying: The Podcast
Episode 21

Download the show here.
This week we recap all the shit we did in Vegas. And we promise next week we’ll be back to the show you know and love!

Follow us on Twitter – @JustSayingPod
Friend us on Facebook – I’m Just Saying: The Podcast
Subscribe on iTunes – I’m Just Saying: The Podcast
Questions? Comments? Complaints? Be a part of The Truth: Email me at Michael@imjustsayingpodcast.com

FacebookMySpaceTwitterDeliciousRedditDiggStumbleUponYahoo BuzzShare
Categories: Podcast Tags:

Policing your own

March 4th, 2010 Michael No comments

I devote a lot of bandwidth policing the inconsistencies of other groups. I rant and rave about religious groups, political groups, and labor groups working against their greater self interest for the greater good in favor of short term but meaningless wins over their enemy of the week. But the time has come for me to police a group I generally claim membership to, though their antics of late have earned as much scorn from me as I give their polar opposites.

From KENS 5 of San Antonio
Emotions ran high last week when an atheist group asked UTSA students to trade in their Bibles for pornographic magazines.

On Monday afternoon, the group set up a table on campus for their “Smut for Smut” trade offer. The group featured a sign at their table that read, “Trade in Holy Text 4 Porn.”

Nearby, some students gathered in protest by reading their Bibles and praying.

After the event, the atheist group posted on their Twitter page, “Too often are we ignored this seems to get people to actually talk to us instead of ignore us.”

The atheist group tells KENS 5 that it will donate all of its Bibles to local libraries.

This comes after bus ads ran last year in Seattle with such tag lines as “Yes Virginia, there is no god.” Atheism is the absence of faith, but this growing movement of (capital A) Atheism is a faith in absence; the absence of God. These ridiculous antics draw negative attention to a people who are supposed to want no attention whatsoever. It also mobilizes the faithful to demonize the faithless and push policies through sympathetic legislatures that damage our society. Atheists shouldn’t taking potshots at Christians (etc etc). Atheists shouldn’t give two shits except in situations where religious belief is being indoctrinated in to our laws. My atheism is not a desire to destroy theology, but a desire to live under my own code based on the reality of our society. I don’t need an explanation for everything that happens. I accept that there some things in this world that I do not understand and probably never will, that sometimes things happen seemingly without explanation.

So I’m calling a Shut it down, Americaon these fascist Atheist groups that expend there energy trying to destroy a group that, by definition, cannot be destroyed by propaganda. Drop your sanctimonious attitude; the faithful are not your enemy, you shouldn’t have the time or desire to fight them. Atheism (little a) is not a movement or a practice or a belief; go about living your life and accept that some people (in fact most people) disagree with you.

FacebookMySpaceTwitterDeliciousRedditDiggStumbleUponYahoo BuzzShare
Categories: Michael Tags:

You can have my Looney Tunes when you pry them from my cold dead hands

March 2nd, 2010 Michael No comments

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) – Speedy Gonzales is taking his folk-hero status, incredible speed and signature red kerchief to the big screen, with help from George Lopez.

The comedian is attached to provide the voice of the fastest mouse in all Mexico for a politically correct live-action/CG hybrid feature set up at New Line Cinema.

The Looney Tunes character debuted in the 1950s as a regular nemesis of Sylvester the Cat. A 1955 short about the tiny hero, “Speedy Gonzales,” won the Academy Award for best short subject, (cartoon). Pat Boone even released a hit song about the famous mouse in 1962.

Over the years, Speedy appeared in the live-action/animation features “Who Framed Roger Rabbit,” “Space Jam” and “Looney Tunes: Back in Action.” But the character has often courted criticism that the ethnic characterizations of him and his compatriots (especially lazy cousin Slowpoke Rodriguez) are stereotypically racist and severely outdated.

Aware of this, New Line and the producers plan to update the brand with a modernized sensibility.

“We wanted to make sure that it was not the Speedy of the 1950s — the racist Speedy,” said the comedian’s wife Ann Lopez, who will serve alongside him as a producer. “Speedy’s going to be a misunderstood boy who comes from a family that works in a very meticulous setting, and he’s a little too fast for what they do. He makes a mess of that. So he has to go out in the world to find what he’s good at.”

That path becomes clearer once Speedy befriends a gun-shy race-car driver.

“Garfield” scribes Alec Sokolow and Joel Cohen will write the script.

Lopez hosts “Lopez Tonight” on TBS and appears in New Line’s ensemble hit “Valentine’s Day,” which has grossed $158 million worldwide after two weekends. He also recently starred in “The Spy Next Door” and provided a voice for “Beverly Hills Chihuahua.

I’m going to ignore that the people associated with the project have shown themselves to be talentless hacks.  The real issue here is that I can’t watch god-damned Speedy Gonzales cartoons because those fucks standing in front of Home Depot might get offended.  That’s not even fair to say, Juan and Pablo don’t give two shits about it, they just want to landscape my yard for a few bucks.  It’s the damn meddlesome lefty apologists that ruined this for us.  Cartoon stereotypes are funny, why can’t we just leave it at that?  Why do we have to pretend that there’s a deeper social commentary to them and that they are some relic from our racist past?  Do you honestly believe Mel Blank hated the Mexicans?  Or people with speech impediments?  I doubt he gave it much thought.  I’ll stake everything on the likelihood that he was just trying to make people laugh.  But the PC Police have taken it away from me.  Well I say no more!  I say no further!  The line must be drawn here!!!  I’m taking my childhood (and my parents childhood) back!  I’m taking it back and taking the power from it and saying it’s just supposed to be funny!  People are generally cool, they can take a joke.  I’ve never heard a Mexican get pissed over Speedy Gonzalez.  I’ve never heard black people get pissed over Daffy Duck.  I’m blind as hell but I don’t protest Mr. Magoo!  It’s just a fucking joke, and you uppity white-folk with too much time on your hands?  I’m cutting you off, you’re ruining life for all of us and sapping the fun out of everything.  Shut it down, America.

I’m taking my shit back….

FacebookMySpaceTwitterDeliciousRedditDiggStumbleUponYahoo BuzzShare
Categories: Michael Tags:

Im Just Saying: The Podcast Episode 20

March 1st, 2010 Michael No comments

Im Just Saying: The Podcast
Episode 20

Download the show here.
This week we brag about all the awesome stuff we’re going to do in Vegas, including the Bar and Nightclub convention!!

We’ll be back in two weeks with a recap of the convention, all the cool new booze coming to the market, the cool ass shit in Vegas, whether or not we win big or lose our ass, and a report on Comic-con.

Follow us on Twitter – @JustSayingPod
Friend us on Facebook – I’m Just Saying: The Podcast
Subscribe on iTunes – I’m Just Saying: The Podcast
Questions? Comments? Complaints? Be a part of The Truth: Email me at Michael@imjustsayingpodcast.com

FacebookMySpaceTwitterDeliciousRedditDiggStumbleUponYahoo BuzzShare
Categories: Michael Tags: